Military leadership can be defined in countless ways. However, one of the most succinct and striking definitions I have found is also one of the simplest. Ridgway
(2000) explains three primary components of effective military leadership: character, courage, and competence. Leadership cannot exist without each of these; one cannot motivate individuals without these factors. Within the military, he argues, a critical aspect of this is self-discipline. Described as “true to themselves and to their conscience,” these men and women are willing to admit when they are wrong or make mistakes, and take responsibility for their actions in times of success and failure (8). Physical and moral courage is demanded of a successful leader, as one must be willing to take calculated risks to achieve long-term success. Accompanying this is the ability to stand up to a commanding officer when the situation warrants it; obedience may be a requirement, but it should never be blind. The final trait, competence, can be physical or mental; remaining informed of military strategies and tactics is paramount, but one must also remain physically competent, able to take action when the situation calls for it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Very nice. I am an Army veteran and can appreciate your information about military leadership. As a subordinate, I sometimes did not mind that my leaders were not the sharpest knife in the drawer, as long as they were honest and displayed integrity and maintained a high level of moral courage and ethical values.
ReplyDeleteHaving competence is also important. When the troops see that that their leader knows what they are doing, the are more apt to trust them and follow.
Mike
Mike,
ReplyDeleteThank you for the post! I agree that competence is very important. I spent my first 14 years as an enlisted member, so I know what it's like to be a subordinate and have to follow leaders. I feel that my enlisted experience is a huge asset to me as an officer! Thanks again!